But on the other hand, international law has negative aspects, as does international law sometimes. If there is no international law and each country has its own law regarding international conflicts, then it will be a really difficult situation to deal with each other and finally arrive at a single decision that everyone agrees with. But everything has positive and negative aspects, so international law should be changed in the future instead of abolishing it. This article focuses on international law and how international law helps to integrate different nations and maintain peace and cooperation in the world. International law is a very broad concept composed of various treaties, agreements between different nations and different subjects of international law. Law is the part of society that helps develop a structure in which rights and obligations are anchored. The world needs to build inter-state relations, and international law fills this gap. This case has shown once again that individuals cannot be excluded from the spectrum of international law. Lawyers around the world are divided into two groups. Some moderates, however, are trying to reach a compromise among themselves. Disagreements among jurists over which entities can be considered subjects of international law have led to the emergence of three popular theories.

The summary of these theories can be summarized as follows: In addition to States, organizations may have such capabilities and immunities if certain conditions are met. The possibility of bringing claims under international law, at least for organizations of a certain type, was set out in the Reparation for Injuries.4 Waldock`s first report on the law of treaties noted the capacity of international organizations (116) to become parties to international agreements, which reflected existing practice.5Since reparation for violations, international organizations have recognized States as This has facilitated the inclusion of fairly limited or marginal entities as such (for international organizations, see Chapter 7). In the case of reparation for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations, the ICJ has ruled that the United Nations may bring an international action for reparation against the State if a United Nations official suffers injury in the performance of his or her duties. The Court implicitly rejected the proposition that only States are subjects of international law. Sir, please guide me .a school of thought says that the just state is the subject of international law, but in my opinion, the state represents their individual, if this hollow then, how can we simply declare is the subject of international law. Hello Senior Counsel Dr. Ruwanthika Gunaratne. I have read your remarks, they are quite good, but what are the objectives of international law? With the question, is international law a real right? International law is a branch of international law that deals with relations between nations. It also refers to laws, rules, and different principles that affect the behavior of different nations.

This means how each nation will behave towards other nations, regulate the various international organizations and determine their role. The main reason for the creation of international law is intergovernmental organizations such as the United Nations with the help of international treaties. International law includes humanitarian law, environmental law, human rights law, and these laws govern in particular the subject matter or issue of these areas. The fact is that a special status can be associated without the creation of a legal entity. A territory within a state can be granted a certain degree of autonomy by treaty, without leading to an independent personality at the international level: this was the case of the Memel region, which had a special status in the period from 1924 to 1939, but remained part of Lithuania.18 Another type of regime, This was the regime proposed by the Trusteeship Council for Jerusalem in 1950 but never applied.19 In such a case, no new legal entity is created unless an agency of an international organization can enjoy some autonomy.

Share: